VIEWPOINT
AMITABH SHUKLA
Perhaps one of the most high
decibel polls after the Lok Sabha battle is being fought in Delhi ,
the result of which could have far reaching implications for all the contesting
parties. BJP, on a dream run, knows that symbolically Delhi
may be a half State but the outcome would suggest consolidation, winning
momentum and would herald positive vibes for the crucial Bihar Assembly polls
later this year. That perhaps explains why Kiran Bedi was inducted despite
having the style and an image of a non-conformist and is being projected as
such a good catch by the party when the poll battle is on a feverish pitch.
For the Aam Aadmi Party, it is
perhaps now or never. The party has realised that if it doesn’t win Delhi
this time round, its cadre would start dwindling and begin desertions towards
other parties. It also knows well that the space which Congress has ceded is
vacant and it was the opportune time to step into that. Congress is hardly in
the picture to present a triangular contest this time round. Its vote base is
consistently slipping and in Lok Sabha polls, it failed to take a lead in even
one of the 70 Assembly segments.
Though it has brought in Ajay
Maken as the leader in Delhi and
tried to aggressively counter both its rivals — AAP and BJP, it is not cutting
much ice. It will have to do a major overhaul, undertake an image building
exercise and needs time to get back the space it has ceded to AAP and the
momentum which is with BJP. A section in BJP perhaps thinks that by getting
Bedi on board and projecting her as the chief ministerial candidate, it has won
half the battle. The way her entry in the party was publicised with party chief
Amit Shah, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley and who is who of BJP, it is quite
clear that if the party comes to power, it won’t look beyond her when it comes
to making her the Chief Minister.
Bedi has built her image
assiduously over the years. She knows how to communicate and involve the media
and people in her causes. She also knows the pulse of the middle class being
the first woman IPS officer of the country. But despite the hype, as an IPS
officer, her track record has not been bright. That perhaps explains how she
didn’t get Delhi Police Commissioner’s job. The disappointment of not becoming
the Delhi Police Commissioner is still there with her as she mentioned this in
her Press conference when she joined BJP.
Senior journalist Pankaj Vohra,
who knows Delhi by the back of his hand and has reported and analysed all
aspects of the metropolitan for three and a half decades, wrote a not so
charitable article about her listing her failures in successive postings. He
says it was her poor track record that came in the way of her becoming the
Commissioner of Delhi Police. Only her stint in the United Nations, as DG of
Tihar Jail and her winning the Magsaysay award helped her get to where she did
in the service.
Vohra says Bedi must be one of
the very few IPS officers in the country who has not been awarded the two
medals — the Police Medal of Meritorious Service (after 15 years service) and
the Police Medal for Distinguished Service (after 21 years), which everyone
gets as a matter of routine. He goes on to say that she has had difficulty in
completing her tenures anywhere. She has always left her postings under
circumstances which would have attracted extreme disciplinary action had Bedi
not been a woman and media darling.
According to Vohra, she was in Goa
during the CHOGM in the early 1980s and left her post after a disagreement with
the Secretary, R&AW and DIB without informing her immediate superior. She
was in Mizoram where an agitation erupted because of her and she left for Delhi
quietly without informing her boss who discovered to his horror that the
operational officer was missing from her post only when he enquired about her
the following day. In Delhi , she
had a controversial tenure in the West District. As Traffic DCP, she is
remembered as “Crane” Bedi, but she had to vacate the position on account of
her mishandling of the traffic problem.
As DCP North in 1988, she got into
a major problem with Tis Hazari lawyers. A committee headed by Justice DP
Wadhwa, then a sitting Judge of the Delhi High Court, passed severe strictures
against her. After that, was never allowed to hold a field posting and was
never made additional or joint commissioner of either the Range or Traffic. Her
stint as Inspector General in Chandigarh
was also shortlived when she returned after differences with the administrator.
So given her track record of the
past and deserting key responsibilities as an IPS officer, some in the BJP are
questioning the merit of bringing Bedi as the chief ministerial candidate. They
say that even if she could swing the middle class votes to some extent, most of
which is in any case with BJP at this point, she should serve her time in the
party and show discipline as a party member for a while before being elevated
to a position like the Chief Minister.
AAP is dusting out the track
record of Bedi to project her poor record vis-à-vis Arvind Kejriwal, another
former civil servant and a colleague of Bedi in the Anna Hazare movement.
Kejriwal had a rather short tenure in the Indian Revenue Service and he spent
some part of it on Right to Information activism. So in public domain his
mistakes are all in the political field ever since he formed AAP and became the
Chief Minister and deserted the chair. His rivals in Congress and BJP have
described him as a “Naxalite”, a “deserter”, an agitationist who does not know
the basics of governance, a person with a single-point agenda, a dictator, the
muffler man, so on and so forth.
But no one can accuse Bedi or
Kejriwal of corrupt practices either when they were in government service or in
social life. Both Bedi and Kejriwal have a lot of similarities. Besides having
excellent communication skills, they have a charisma due what many call as
“image management”. That perhaps explains why BJP brought in Bedi to counter
Kejriwal. Both negate each other well, AAP would find it difficult to attack
Bedi, The former IPS officer too would not be able to convincingly attack
Kejriwal in electioneering. But the difference would be in the post poll
scenario. While Bedi will have to go by the party dictum of the BJP and the rules
framed by its bosses, Kejriwal writes his own political rules and is extremely
innovative as we have seen over a period of time.
I do not know the reasons why Dr
Harsh Vardhan, the soft spoken doctor from Krishna Nagar and Union Minister was
dumped as the chief ministerial candidate this time round. He was BJP’s face in
2013 Assembly polls and almost got the party near the half way mark. He was
then asked to contest Lok Sabha elections, made Union Health Minister but soon
dumped and given an insignificant portfolio. He could have been a good choice
but if someone like Jagdish Mukhi or Satish Upadhyay had been projected as
chief ministerial candidates versus Kejriwal, the party would have certainly
lost in the initial round itself when a build up takes place for polls.
Remember, in 2008 polls, BJP projected Vijay Kumar Malhotra as the chief
ministerial candidate against Sheila Dikshit and the day the announcement came,
party lost the polls.
Clearly the battlelines are drawn
in the Kiran Bedi versus Arvind Kejriwal battle. If one scrutinizes the track
record of both, it does not inspire great confidence. But then, electoral
battles are fought on public perception and on that count, both Bedi and
Kejriwal are on an equal footing. This increases the possibility of a real
photo finish in the most keenly watched elections after the Lok Sabha polls. (January 19, 2015 )
http://www.dailypioneer.com/state-editions/dehradun/battle-of-delhi-kiran-bedi-vs-arvind-kejriwal.html
http://www.dailypioneer.com/state-editions/dehradun/battle-of-delhi-kiran-bedi-vs-arvind-kejriwal.html