VIEWPOINT
AMITABH SHUKLA
Himachal Pradesh and Gujarat
have given their verdict and members of both the main parties would argue that
it is honours shared equally between the Congress and the Bharatiya Janata
Party. Though the score-line reads 1-1, it is a setback to the BJP as its
Mission 2014 has found an obstacle and hit a roadblock in the hill State of Himachal
Pradesh .
BJP was widely expected to do
well in Gujarat and Narendra Modi has once again proved
his political mettle and understanding of the socio-politico-economic milieu of
Gujarat . As the result was on expected lines, the
euphoria within the BJP camp is somewhat subdued. Moreover, it was the victory
of the personality of Modi against whom there was practically a vacuum in state
Congress leadership. Gujarat has merely reiterated what
the people already knew - that BJP would win and there were no surprises. The
third victory of BJP under Modi might have given the party a prime ministerial
candidate but it does not necessarily indicate the way political wind is
blowing in the rest of the country.
It was in Himachal Pradesh which
clearly proved to be a setback for the BJP in the run-up to the 2014 Lok Sabha
elections. Whether the party leaders admit it or not, BJP’s dream to rule New
Delhi after the next Lok Sabha elections has received
a jolt and Himachal was a wake-up call for the party to redraw its national
strategy. Rather than highlighting the local issues, the BJP had heavily banked
on the anti-Congress sentiments prevailing at the national level which
backfired.
Here was a state election and a
classic case where everything was going against the Congress and there was
nothing which could have practically helped it except anti-incumbency in the
state. There was country-wide anger
against price rise. Increase in the price if diesel in a state where the entire
economy is dependent on road transport had affected all sections. Putting a Cap
on subsidised LPG cylinders had hit every household. Then, there were serial
charges against Congress led central government on corruption - Commonwealth
Games, 2G scam, Coalgate scam and others. If that were not enough, there were
specific charges against Virbhadra Singh, the chief ministerial candidate of
the party on several counts.
If Congress defied all that was
going against it and still managed to win the polls, clearly, BJP central
leadership will have to do introspection as to what went wrong with their
strategy. The momentum has been lost for
the party and now it is almost certain that corruption per se is not going to
be an issue in the next parliamentary polls. If it could not become an issue in
a developed and literate State like Himachal Pradesh, it is indeed difficult to
make an issue out of it in the next elections. At best, it could be one of the
planks of the 2014 polls, not “The Issue” on which elections are found and won.
It is a fact that for almost a
quarter of a century, no incumbent Government has been repeated in Himachal
Pradesh. But this cannot be the excuse of the party for defeat in Himachal
Pradesh. In neighbouring Punjab , no party had been
repeated for over four decades. But the Akali Dal-BJP did it a few months ago.
BJP has done it, not only in Gujarat on several
occasions but also twice in both Madhya Pradesh and Chhatisgarh. In Himachal,
anti incumbency was a factor not the main factor which decided the results.
In Himachal, while the macro
issues which were being raised in the country did not play much role, the micro
and state specific issues did play a major role. In the BJP, it was a battle
between the old school and the new school of the party which significantly
contributed to the defeat. The old school is represented by national vice
president Shanta Kumar while the new school is represented by chief minister
Prem Kumar Dhumal.
While the old school led by Kumar
wanted tickets on the basis of emotional reasons, ideological factors, loyalty
to an individual, an organisation and a cause, the new school wanted ticket
distribution on the basis of winning ability, on the basis of grassroots level
assessment, on the basis of the realities existing in each and every
constituency. In 15 seats of Kangra, supposed to be the stronghold of Kumar,
BJP won only three. All Kumar loyalists lost and the three who got tickets and
won were not loyalists of the BJP veteran. They got tickets because it could
not have been denied to them due to their own standing in the party. Rebels
mushroomed here and practically led to the rout of the party. Had BJP done well
in Kangra, it would have been tantalisingly close to the halfway mark.
In Himachal Congress, there is
hardly any old school of politics, little or no ideology as the party is an
election winning machinery. Virbhadra Singh spends most of his time in
Himachal, knows every nook and corner of the State, is aware of every hill and
hillock, knows the State like the back of his hand and in every village of the
State, he knows somebody or the other personally. So the old principles of
loyalty and the new ground realities in the state where elections were held for
the first time after delimitation, found a meeting point.
While the macro issues are
important, in local assembly polls, the micro issues are significant and
contribute to victory or defeat. Wherever BJP focused at the micro level, it
won. But it was Virbhadra Singh who is a master of the game at the age of 78
whose micro poll management was unbeatable. The BJP was simply no match to it,
divided as it was between the tussle of the old school with the new, between
Kumar and Dhumal factions.
Then there was the factor of the
Government employees, who form almost 15 per cent of the State population along
with their families. In Himachal, there is a popular saying that the employees
want more and more from the government. While the Dhumal Government did all
they could within the existing resources, they wanted more and this could have
been done only by a new Government.
In the hill State, it is
practically a two-party system for the last almost four decades. I talked to a
few experts in Shimla and they were in agreement that both the BJP and Congress
are seen as occupying the centrist stage. The BJP is not seen as right of the
Centre nor is the Congress here seen as slightly left of the Centre as is the
position elsewhere in the country. They said that the ideological positions in
the state have not hardened nor have the RSS or its affiliates been as active
as in other northern States. This has ensured that BJP remains a centrist party
by and large. So, the people tend to vote one way or the other and change the
government every five years as there is nothing much for the people of the
State to choose from between the Congress and BJP in terms of ideology. (December 24, 2012)
http://dailypioneer.com/state-editions/chandigarh/117714-lessons-of-himachal-pradesh-for-bjp.html
http://dailypioneer.com/state-editions/dehradun/117720-lessons-of-himachal-pradesh-for-bjp.html
No comments:
Post a Comment